Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Parrot v. Mallinckrodt PLC et al
as 4:2019cv02634
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Irving Parrot, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Cathy Parrot, Deceased and Irving Parrot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munkres v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv01174
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Terrill J. Munkres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv01175
Plaintiff:
Irene M. Smith and David B. Smith
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearlson v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00899
Plaintiff:
David Pearlson
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Monsanto Company and John Does 1-50
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton and Candace Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ludovicy et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00195
Plaintiff:
Peter Ludovicy and Mary J. Ludovicy
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruth Gurley v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00192
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Ruth Gurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Stewart
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bingham et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Oscar Bingham and Carolyn Bingham
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
