Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Yvonne Boughter v. Town of Ocean City, Maryland -
as 10-1017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVONNE M. BOUGHTER, Individually and in her Representative Capacity, as Personal Representative of the Estate of PATRICK J. BOUGHTER, and the Estate of KELLY M. BOUGHTER and MORGAN R. BOUGHTER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF OCEAN CITY, MARYLAND - DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FIRE/EMS DIVISION, BROOKS MORRIS, BRYON TRIMBLE and others
Chaney v. Airserv Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Chaney
Defendant:
Airserv Corporation, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/Airplane
Boughter et al v. Town of Ocean City, Maryland-Department of Emergency Services Fire/EMS Division et al
as 1:2009cv01689
Plaintiff:
Yvonne M. Boughter and Morgan R. Boughter
Defendant:
Town of Ocean City, Maryland-Department of Emergency Services Fire/EMS Division, Brooks Morris, Bryon Trimble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Doe I et al v. Diocese of Charleston, The et al
as 2:2009cv00955
Plaintiff:
John Doe I and John Doe 2
Defendant:
Diocese of Charleston, The, Bishop of Charleston, The, Robert Baker and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Flora v. JPS Elastomerics et al
as 4:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Flora
Defendant:
JPS Elastomerics, JPS Industries, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Absher v. Martin et al
as 5:2008cv00107
Plaintiff:
Paul Douglas Absher, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Eugene Martin, Harold Harper Hartley, II, Gene Alan Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2007cv01629
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services , Elizabeth G Patterson , Kim S Aydlette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
