Cases 51 - 60 of 100
James v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Regan T. James
Defendant:
Stephen Benjamin, Daniel Hood, Jeffery Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. United States et al
as 5:2016cv03913
Plaintiff:
Burl Washington
Defendant:
United States, Mrs. Cruz, Loranth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickens v. Napolitano et al
as 6:2016cv03606
Plaintiff:
Brian Mickens
Defendant:
Brandon Napolitano, John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hoch v. Doe 2 et al
as 6:2016cv03492
Plaintiff:
Edgar Hoch
Defendant:
John Doe 2 , Deputy Durham , Steve Loftis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valizadeh v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv03098
Plaintiff:
Daryush Valizadeh
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Does 2-10 and Jane Does 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirtman v. Helbig et al
as 4:2016cv02839
Plaintiff:
Derrick E Kirtman
Defendant:
Chaplain Helbig, SIA Stivers, Lt Dumbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osteen v. Belfor USA et al
as 3:2016cv01651
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Osteen
Defendant:
Belfor USA , Sunbelt Rentals Inc , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Follin v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 3:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
Marsha Follin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP , John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collopy et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 8:2015cv00981
Plaintiff:
Beverly Leeann Collopy , Stephen M Collopy , Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Glenn Farrow, Anderson County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reasoner v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Reasoner, III
Defendant:
Tracy Smith, Centraarchy Restaurant Management Company , Redwing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
