Cases 51 - 60 of 309
DELGADO v. RADDAD et al
as 2:2021cv02534
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O RADDAD and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELGADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. DOE 2 et al
as 2:2021cv02250
Defendant:
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC., OHI ASSET (PA) TRUST, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLEY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAXWELL v. SOBER et al
as 2:2021cv01939
Defendant:
JAMIE SOBER, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DANA MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASIANO v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv00918
Defendant:
JANE DOE, DEPUTY WARDEN MCFADDEN, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS CASIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALLS v. P/O D.T. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2021cv00903
Defendant:
P/O JOHN DOE #2, P/O JOHN DOE #3, P/O JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SMALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMIDT v. LEIGHTON STATE POLICE BARRACKS et al
as 2:2021cv00736
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE LEIGHTON STATE TROOPER, CARBON COUNTY SHERRIF DEPT., OFFICER SWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MARIE SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. KING et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Defendant:
NANCY GIANNETTA, LEON A. KING, II and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff:
RAKYM DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JINES et al v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2021cv00346
Defendant:
THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION doing business as DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and QUALITYHEALTH STAFFING, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00338
Defendant:
RAINES RAYCEN, GENEVA LONE HILL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
