Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MacDonald v. Chief Boston Police, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF BOSTON POLICE, John Doe, BOSTON POLICE OFFICERS, JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Macdonald v. Boston Police et al
as 1:2022cv12233
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Boston Police, Boston Police Officers, John Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv12184
Plaintiff:
Joshua Santos
Defendant:
Joseph M. Murphy, Correctional Officer Trout, Lieutenant Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gelb, et al
as 15-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, The Commisioner of the Department of Correction (DOC), THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C, ROBBY R. DOBB, The Liutenant at S.B.C.C and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE GELB, Former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C, JOE FREITAS, The Lieutenant at MCI, CJ, MICHAEL D. FARLEY, The Sergeant at S.B.C.C and others
Latimore v. Suffolk County House of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv13378
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Latimore
Defendant:
Suffolk County House of Correction, John Doe Correctional Officer #1 and John Doe Correctional Officer #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jones, et al
as 14-1168
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commisioner of the Department of Corrections, BRUCE GELB, former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C., THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C. and others
WALKER v. NICHOLS et al
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WALKER
Defendant:
RALPH NICHOLS, PATRICIA BARNHART, SCOTT BURNHEIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vera v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2010cv10442
Plaintiff:
Jose Vera
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Bennett, Bule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
