Cases 11 - 20 of 1,405
TOWN OF SILER CITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF SILER CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Warren v. Braswell et al
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. WARREN, JR.
Defendant:
TYLER BRASWELL, North Carolina Department of Insurance and John Doe
Respondent:
New Hanover County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Barnes et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Collins
Defendant:
FNU Barnes, FNU Isenhour and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Alexander Correctional Institution, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polidi v. Boston et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Louis Boston, David Shewchuk, Charletta Blackshear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Gaddy
Defendant:
Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
