Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc. v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Justin McCoy, Eric Minnig, Corey Richardson and others
Cherry v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Cherry
Defendant:
IDOC, Sandy Perally, Robert Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazell,et al. v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
JOHN STEPHEN HAZELL and C.H.
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and John Does 1-10
St. John, et al. v. Kootenai County Idaho, et al.
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Daniel St. John and Dawn Workman
Defendant:
Kootenai County Idaho, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, Benjamin Wolfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St. John et al v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dawn Workman and Daniel St. John
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Shane Vrevich, Anthony Ghirarduzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reeder v. LG Chem Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00032
Defendant:
LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Tucker Geroge Reeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrari v. Zimmer US, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Manufacturing, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Lee W. Ferrari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Clegg v. City of Rigby, et al.
as 4:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Trina K Clegg and Trina K. Clegg
Defendant:
Rigby Police Department, Brad Tinsley, City of Rigby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Siegert et al
as 1:2019cv00223
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-10, Rona Siegert and J. Dolan
Plaintiff:
Steve Allan Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Lizer et al
as 1:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Ralph Randy Clayton
Defendant:
James Lizer, Jr , Finster Courier Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
