Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Gibson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03202
Plaintiff:
Robert Gibson
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department and John Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02723
Plaintiff:
Kazan Joseph
Defendant:
The City of New York , The New York City Police Department , Kenroy Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azcona v. Kondaur Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
Marisa Azcona
Defendant:
John Doe 1 through 4 and Kondaur Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heywood v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Defendant:
Detective Joseph Alohan, City of New York, John Does 1 through 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Benila Heywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.D. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
M.D.
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Does 1 through 4 and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2011cv03008
Plaintiff:
Howard Johnson
Defendant:
John Montgomery , Randy Weaver and John Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sampson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00328
Plaintiff:
Raszel Sampson
Defendant:
The City of New York , John Does 1 through 4 and Jane Does 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv05035
Defendant:
C.O. Allen, Department of Correction, Deputy Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06021
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mullins
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe 1 through 4 and Jane Doe 1 through 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
