Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Stitt v. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
as 3:2012cv03704
Plaintiff:
Darryl A. Stitt and John Dudley
Defendant:
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lamm v. Health Assurance
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Dudley Lamm
Defendant:
Health Assurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Utah First Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Dudley
Defendant:
Utah First Federal Credit Union and Scalley Reading Bates Hansen and Rasmussen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Dudley v. Zions First National Bank
as 2:2010mc00124
Plaintiff:
John Dudley and John Dudley
Defendant:
Zions First National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Dudley v. Utah First Credit Union
as 2:2010mc00123
Plaintiff:
John Dudley and John Dudley
Defendant:
Utah First Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
IN EQUITY A-3 : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. ORR WATER DITCH COMPANY
as 3:1973cv00003
Interested Party:
301 Flint Street, LLC, B. Lorraine Griffin Trust, Bordertown, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Avis E. Andrulli, Trustee Julius A Ballardini, Bridgewater Family Trust and others
Respondent:
Avis E. Andrulli, Churchill County et al., Reno City of and others
Petitioner:
Churchill, County Of, Fallon, City Of, North Valley Holdings and others
775)883-9900 (fax:
City of Fernley
:
Distribution Only, Fernley, Town of, Nevada State Engineer and others
Intervenor:
State of California
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Dudley et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Edward John Dudley and Ann Marie Dudley
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hollander et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2008cv02132
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elson, Sheela Indran, William Henry Hiscocks and others
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
