Cases 31 - 40 of 316
JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C. JERRY-EL
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, MS. ANGEL, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. MOORE et al
as 2:2021cv00298
Defendant:
ROBERT MCSURDY, PETER C. SAAVEDRA, TRAVIS NAPP and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TAYLOR v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
CONELIUS TAYLOR and CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and BARRY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BATES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LUCINDA GAILEY and BARRY SMITH
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Respondent:
SECRETRAY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Graham
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00148
Defendant:
COUNSELOR BEERS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM and KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOLDEN v. FISCUS et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
SHAVEZ HOLDEN and SHAWVEZ NELSON
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, M. OVERMYER, Z. MOSLAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
BOBBI J. SALAMON, HUNT, PROBURSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01957
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT DETWILER, INMATE ACCOUNTS SUPERVISOR, LIEUTENANT H. VEIHDOFFER and others
Plaintiff:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RAMBERT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01760
Defendant:
D. L. YINGLING, ERIC D. RAY, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
