Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McPherson v. Doll et al
as 1:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
John J. Doll, Eugene Quinn, Richard C. Litman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00087
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J Doll, US Patent and Trademark Office and Free-Flow Packaging International Inc
Respondent:
CMD Corporation
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00104
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J. Doll, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Free-Flow Packaging International, Inc. and others
PREGIS CORPORATION v. DOLL et al
as 2:2009cv05818
Plaintiff:
PREGIS CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL, UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, FREE-FLOW PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Pregis Corporation v. Doll et al
as 1:2009mc00094
Plaintiff:
Pregis Corporation and Pregis Corporation
Defendant:
John J. Doll, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Free-Flow Packaging International, Inc. and others
KROLL v. DOLL et al
as 1:2009cv01484
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL I. KROLL
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL and HARRY I. MOATZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EXELIXIS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01431
Plaintiff:
EXELIXIS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
DYAX CORP. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01434
Plaintiff:
DYAX CORP.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
JURIDICAL FOUNDATION THE CHEMO-SERO-THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01383
Plaintiff:
JURIDICAL FOUNDATION THE CHEMO-SERO-THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. DOLL
as 1:2009cv01373
Plaintiff:
X-CEPTOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOLL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
