Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SUI JURIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv03633
Defendant:
ROBERT J. RADARO, JOHN J. WHELAN, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DOMONIQUE JORDAN SUI JURIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Talbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN J. WHELAN, District Attorney, Delaware County, PA and others
TALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
DARREN TALBERT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, JOHN J. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIGHTWELL v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (ET.AL.)
as 1:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
BOBBY BRIGHTWELL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, (ET.AL.), PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. MCGARRIGLE et al
as 2:2014cv04757
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant:
TOM MCGARRIGLE, MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., COLLEEN P. MORRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv06531
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MORALES
Defendant:
THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO., STEVEN M. PAPER, PATRICK J. CONNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
County of Delaware, Pennsylvan v. DOT
as 07-1385
Petitioner:
County of Delaware, Pennsylvania, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Andrew J. Reilly, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Delaware County Council, Linda A. Cartisano, individually and in her official capacity as Vice-Chair of the Delaware County Council and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, Secretary of Transportation, Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
