Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Grethen v. Clarke et al
as 2:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Grethen
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Gene M. Johnson, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coles v. Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse et al
as 2:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Corey Coles
Defendant:
Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse, Harold Clarke and Spouse, G. Robinson and Spouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Mullins et al
as 7:2012cv00494
Defendant:
D. Ball, Officer Barter, Bray and others
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Faye Barnes
Defendant:
Johnathan Bernard Bland, Wendy Hobbs, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strickland v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Defendant:
Tony Adams, (First Name Unknown) Ball, James Bentley and others
Plaintiff:
Kim M Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marron v. Jabe et al
as 1:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
Travis Jackson Marron
Defendant:
John Jabe and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloom v. Jabe et al
as 7:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Daniel V.F. Bloom
Defendant:
Major C.D. Davis, Larry T. Edmonds, David B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rountree v. Clark et al
as 7:2011cv00572
Defendant:
J. Bland, V. Booker, D. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Piper A. Rountree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Clarke et al
as 3:2011cv00731
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCoy
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John Jabe and Loretta K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
