Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, DIEGO F. CALDERIN, MICHAEL J. CLEMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 22-2723
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, BRITTON H. MURDOCH, CHAIRMAN, ANDREA F. GILBERT, DIRECTOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
Gray v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Gray, Sr.
Defendant:
Claire DeMatteis, Dr. Erskins, Michael Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkley et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Brian Hinkley, Lori Humble, Alva John and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Waples v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Javaughn D. Waples
Defendant:
John May, Sherri McAfee-Garner and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAY v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Waples v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Javaughn D. Waples
Defendant:
John May, Sherri McAfee-Garner and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00588
Defendant:
Diego F. Calderin, A. John May, III, Andrea F. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Artis
Stein v. Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00563
Defendant:
Diego F. Calderin, Kevin Tylus, Michael J. Clement and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
SHEEHAN v. MAY et al
as 1:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
ALAN SHEEHAN
Defendant:
JOHN MAY and TIFFANY OLIVER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
