Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Klick v. Cenikor Foundation
as 22-90045
Respondent:
Timothy Klick, Wilton Chambers, Mailk Aleem and others
Petitioner:
Cenikor Foundation
Potter et al v. Potter, et al
as 4:2019cv10300
Plaintiff:
Peter Potter, Paul Potter and Patrick John Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. et al v. United States General Services Administration et al
as 2:2016cv03791
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ann Bramson, Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc., Group for the East End and others
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Denise Turner Roth, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Doe #1 et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09052
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Patrick J. Fitzgerald, David Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00805
Plaintiff:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CARRIE L. FOX, RICHARD ALAN CALVERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Floyd et al, vs. Ricketts, et al
as 1:1981cv01754
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Floyd , Ernest L. Walker , Harold Turman and others
Defendant:
James G. Ricketts and Colorado Department of Corrections
Interested_party:
Justin Rueb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lance McDermott v. John Potter, et al
as 09-35999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE MCDERMOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General United States Postal Service, DON JACOBUS, USPS Seattle Processing and Distribution Manager and KATHERINE NASH, USPS Seattle District Manager
Curiale v. Potter et al
as 3:2009mc00016
Plaintiff:
Joseph Curiale
Defendant:
John Potter and United States Postal Service
Corbett v. Potter
as 8:2008cv02437
Plaintiff:
Monique S. Corbett
Defendant:
John Potter
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
