Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Demos v. State of Washington
as 1:2022cv03051
Petitioner:
John R Demos
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Satterberg
as 2:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
John R Demos and John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Satterberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv05083
Plaintiff:
John R Demos and John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Robert M Jackson, Caria Schettler and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
John R Demos
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv05679
Plaintiff:
John R Demos and John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Martin, Dan Satterberg and Jay Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Martin et al
as 4:2021cv05125
Plaintiff:
John R Demos
Defendant:
Julie Martin, Donald Holbrook, Jay Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Demos v. Governor of Washington et al
as 2:2020cv01653
Respondent:
Governor of Washington and Governor of California
Petitioner:
John R. Demos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Robert Demos et al v. The State Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2019cv08043
Defendant:
The Governor of The State of California, The Governor of The State of South Dakota, The Virginia Company and others
Plaintiff:
John R Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H. and John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. State of Washington et al
as 4:2019cv05145
Petitioner:
John R Demos
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. Holbrook
as 2:2018cv01150
Petitioner:
John R Demos
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
