Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dingus v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2010cv00435
Plaintiff:
De'Ossie Dingus
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Safety, Tennessee Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robert Eckerman v. Tennessee Department of Safety, et al
as 09-6181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ECKERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, an agency of the State of Tennessee, GERALD NICELY, Former Department of Safety Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, MIKE WALKER, Colonel, Tennessee Highway Patrol, in his individual and official capacities and others
Garback v. Cyber-Trace Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv12407
Defendant:
Cyber-Trace Technologies, Inc., Linda Lossing, Marvin Shwedel and others
Plaintiff:
Brent J Garback
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eckerman v. Tennessee Department of Safety et al
as 3:2007cv00627
Plaintiff:
Robert Eckerman
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Safety, Gerald Nicely, Mike Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
