Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stockton v. Barnes
as 5:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robert John Stockton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ron E Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stockton, Jr. v. People of the State of California, et al.
as 2:2013cv02413
Petitioner:
Robert John Stockton, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Greg Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stockton v. Lewis
as 5:2013cv03978
Petitioner:
Robert John Stockton, Jr.
Respondent:
Greg D. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stockton v. Adams et al
as 5:2011cv05562
Plaintiff:
Robert John Stockton, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrel John Adams, R. Subia and D Bradbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Aaron Brooks v. Dr Fernandez et al
as 5:2011cv00619
Defendant:
Allen, Allen, Almond and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Charles Brooks v. Dr. Fernandez, et al
as 10-56469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN, Mr., in his individual and official capacity, FERNANDEZ, Dr., in his/her individual and official capacity, MARINEZ, Mr., in his individual and official capacity and others
Charles Aaron Brooks v. Mr Quitana et al
as 5:2010cv01315
Defendant:
Mr Allen, Mr. Allen, Mr Esquitini and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Charles Aaron Brooks v. John Does
as 5:2010cv00423
Defendant:
Mr. Allen, Mr. Almond, Ms. Avalo and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
