Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
William Davis, Jr. v. Wake County Dept of Human Svcs
as 15-2038
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ramon Rajano, Warren Ludwig, John Tanner, Wake County Attorney's Office County Attorney and supervisor of the Wake County Attorney's Office Albert J. Singer, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, School of Medicine Progam on Childhood Trauma and Maltreatment, JOHN HELMINSKI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2035
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, individually and in her official capacity as governor, and predecessor Mike Easley, individually and official capacity as governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in his official capacity as county manager of Wake County, North Carolina and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Wake County Dept of Human Svc
as 15-2023
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, Next best Friend to Natural Minor Child J.F.D
Defendant - Appellee: WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ramon Rajano, Warren Ludwig, John Tanner, Wake County Attorney's Office County Attorney, Wake County Attorney's Office Attorney, Albert J. Singer
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., and as next best friend J.F.D.a minor child
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as governor of the State of North Carlolina, MELANIE A. SHEKITA, individually and in her official capacity as assistant district attorney, Wake County, North Carolina and others
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff: William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant: State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. Wake County Department of Huma
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., Next best Friend to Natural Minor Child J.F.D
Defendant - Appellee: WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ramon Rajano, Warren Ludwig, John Tanner, Wake County Attorney's Office County Attorney, Wake County Attorney's Office Attorney, Albert J. Singer
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 11-1420
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Governor Beverely Perdue, Individually And in Her official Capacity as Governor, And Predecessor Mike Easley, individually And official capacity as Governor, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, David Cook individually, and in His official Capacity as County Manager of Wake County North Carolina and others
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 09-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor: STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1623
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor: STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Supporting Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROFESSORS, AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?