Cases 1 - 10 of 230
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSTON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Patricia Johnston
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JOHNSTON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Preston Johnston
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CARLOS JATIVA, MARK ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Lori Johnston
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOGAN v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOGAN
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, BOROUGH OF COLWYN, MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston et al v. Encompass Home and Auto Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Johnston and Kelli Johnston
Defendant:
Encompass Home and Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIAMMARINARO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2023cv04086
Plaintiff:
PAUL GIAMMARINARO
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY SHERIFF RICHARD H. JOHNSTON, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY LIEUTENANT GEORGE VOLPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
