Cases 21 - 30 of 955
Jones v. Maryland State Police et al
as 1:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Maryland State Police, Salisbury Maryland Police and Baltimore Maryland Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv03310
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department, State of Maryland and Salisbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jones v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03058
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Actavis LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sally Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. IRS et al
as 1:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
IRS and Joseph R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlow v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Petitioner:
Joshua Barlow
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. F M Dill Farms
as 1:2023cv02928
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
F M Dill Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ivanov v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv02903
Petitioner:
Ivanov S. Patel and Pavel S. Ivanov
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simms Showers LLP v. Jones
as 1:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
Simms Showers LLP
Defendant:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
