Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jordan Mitchell v. John Stone
as 23-6196
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN STONE, District Attorney Official Capacity, MEDICAL STAFF, Official Capacity and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
MITCHELL v. STONE et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOHN STONE, MEDICAL STAFF and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. PATTERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
TIM PATTERSON, JEFFREY, OFFICER BETHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan Mitchell v. Guilford County Detention Center
as 22-6463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MEDICAL STAFF, CORPORAL HALL and HERNANDEZ, STAFF MEMBER
Jordan Mitchell v. Ms. Seagraze
as 22-6457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAGRAZE, POD OFFICER, SERGEANT YOUNG, CAPTAIN ROGERS, INTERNAL AFFAIRS and others
MITCHELL v. SEAGRAZE et al
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
MS. SEAGRAZE, SARGENT YOUNG, CAPTAIN ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Respondent:
SGT. GREEN and DEPUTY HELMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan Mitchell v. District Attorney
as 21-7603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY and SHERIFF ROGERS
Jordan Mitchell v. Dentist
as 21-7565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DENTIST, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, (Guilford County), ROGERS and others
MITCHELL v. DENTIST et al
as 1:2021cv00830
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
DENTIST, DISTRICT ATTORNEY (GUILFORD COUNTY), SHERRIF ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
