Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Manarin v. Mattson et al
as 3:2020cv01261
Defendant:
Conjugal partnership formed by William and Jacquelyn Mattson, Jacquelyn Dee Mattson, William Blair mattson and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Renato Manarin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge Melendez v. Ralph Hanson
as 19-40594
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH HANSON, Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE LUIS MELENDEZ
Melendez v. Hanson
as 2:2018cv00256
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Melendez
Defendant:
Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melendez v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Jorge Louis Melendez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Melendez Chavez v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00440
Petitioner:
Jorge Adalberto Melendez Chavez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jorge Melendez v. United States
as 16-3032
Petitioner:
Jorge Louis Melendez
Respondent:
United States of America
Alvarado Jimenez et al v. Price
as 3:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Sergio Alvarado Jimenez, Roman Luis Baltazar, Saul Bustos Lorzo and others
Notice Only Party:
Gary L. Anderson and Magdalena Jara
Defendant:
Corey Price
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Acosta Rivera et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ivan Acosta Rivera, Sergio Alvarado Jimenez, Roman Luis Baltazar and others
Defendant:
DZT Inc., FedEx Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jorge Melendez v. J. Ochoa
as 13-55831
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE A. MELENDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
J. TIM OCHOA, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
