Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans et al
as 6:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Defendant:
The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist Americans, Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKE v. CANADY et al
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wendell Locke and WENDELL TERRY LOCKE
Defendant:
CHARLES CANADY, RICKY POLSTON, JORGE LABARGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
TURNER v. CANADY et al
as 4:2021cv00163
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, ALAN LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON B TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadson v. Labarga et al
as 9:2020cv81067
Defendant:
Chief Financial Banking, The State of Florida, Jorge Labarga and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Gadson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Behl v. Peters et al
as 8:2019cv02608
Defendant:
R. Timothy Peters, Robert J. Krauss, E. C. Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Behl, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv61639
Defendant:
Sandi Digiamo, George Anthony, William Steers and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHESTNUT v. CANADY et al
as 4:2019cv00271
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT
Defendant:
JOHN TOMASINO, CLERK FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, CHARLES CANADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. LABARGA et al
as 4:2018cv00423
Defendant:
JORGE LABARGA, PEGGY A QUINCE, R FRED LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L TATE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMITTE v. WELLS et al
as 4:2018cv00308
Defendant:
KENNETH B BELL, RUTLEDGE P LILES, RICKY POLSTON and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE COMMITTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gadson v. Gerber et al
as 9:2018cv80209
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Gadson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jonathan D. Gerber and Jorge Labarga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
