Cases 1 - 10 of 21
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jose Perez
as 21-1847
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE PEREZ, also known as BEE-MAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ruiz-Magana v. ABP Public Adjuster Co. et al
as 1:2020cv06823
Defendant:
Jose Perez, ABP Public Adjuster Co., Abilene Berreles and others
Plaintiff:
Baltasar Ruiz-Magana
Perez v. Martinez Produce & Seafood, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01902
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez
Defendant:
Martinez Produce & Seafood, Inc. and Teodoro Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perez v. Moctezuma Mufflers, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11161
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Perez
Defendant:
Moctezuma Mufflers, Inc. , Moctezuma Mufflers I, Inc. , Moctezuma Mufflers II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dippner v. Superheat FGH Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02773
Defendant:
Superheat FGH Services Inc. , Juan Jose Perez Reyes , Superheat FGN and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Dippner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dippner v. Superheat FGH Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10743
Plaintiff:
Lori Dippner
Defendant:
Superheat FGH Services, Inc. , Superheat FGH , Juan Jose Perez Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jimenez-Carranza et al v. SBM Maintenance Contractors, Inc et al
as 1:2015cv06457
Defendant:
Robert Norton and SBM Maintenance Contractors, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Barreto, Jose Perez, Andres Jimenez-Carranza and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
