Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Torres v. Price
as 2:2014cv00842
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez Torres
Respondent:
J. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoff, et al v. Del Carmen Garriga, et al
as 12-1008
Plaintiff:
RICARDO HEREDIA, RAFAEL DIAZ-LEBRON, MARIA GARRIGA and others
Defendant:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO, FREDERIC V. SALERNO and others
Interested Party:
MIGUEL CANIO, FRANCISCO LOPEZ-DOSAL, CARMEN MUNOZ-BERRERO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LUISA VIRGINIA FUSTER BERLINGERI
Intervenor:
DALMIS PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUSELL HOFF, ESTATE OF MANUEL ROMERO-SANCHEZ, Represented by its Administrator Fernando Otero, Consolidated from Civil 09-1582, JMV INVESTMENT GROUP INC., Represented by its Administrator Fernando Otero, Consolidated from Civil 09-1582 and others
Hoff, et al v. Del Carmen Garriga, et al
as 12-1008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUSELL HOFF, GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, NILDA PICO and others
Plaintiff:
CECI MONTILLA-ROJO, CARLOS CAMINO-RIOS, SONIA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ and others
:
LUISA VIRGINIA FUSTER BERLINGERI
Defendant:
POPULAR, INC., RICHARD L. CARRION, JORGE A. JUNQUERA and others
Intervenor:
DALMIS PEREZ
Interested Party - Appellant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN GARRIGA, ALFREDO CARL MELTZ-NARVAEZ, FRANCISCO LOPEZ-DOSAL and others
Jose Torres v. John Haviland
as 09-17615
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE RAMIREZ TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN W. HAVILAND
Torres v. Havilland
as 2:2009cv00531
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez Torres
Respondent:
John Havilland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Unknown
as 08-15408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RAMIREZ TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Ramirez Torres vs unknown
as 2:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez Torres
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
