Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Romero v. Houston Garden Center
as 4:2016cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero
Defendant:
Houston Garden Center
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Romero v. USA
as 1:2016cv00356
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jose Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Romero v. The Clean Doctors of New York, Ltd. et al
as 2:2015cv06950
Defendant:
Jason Nogin and The Clean Doctors of New York, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Romero v. ABC Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv05861
Defendant:
ABC Corp., ABC Corp., Andrew M. Buglione and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jose Romero et al v. Riverside County Sheriff Deputy et al
as 5:2015cv01978
Defendant:
Does and Riverside County Sheriff Deputy Badge Number 2052
Plaintiff:
Virginia Ramirez and Jose Romero
Movant:
minor suing under J
Diallo v. City of New York, et al.
as 1:2015cv07312
Defendant:
Peter Curran, Michael Sheehan, John Doe 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mamdou Diallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero et al v. 733 Restaurant Corp.
as 1:2015cv06174
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero , Emmanuel Aparacio and Cesareo Robles
Defendant:
733 Restaurant Corp., 91 Main Nyack Llc, James Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero et al v. 733 Restaurant Corp.
as 1:2015cv06171
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero , Cesareo Robles and Emmanuel Aparacio
Defendant:
733 Restaurant Corp., 91 Main Nyack, L.L.C., James Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Romero et al v. Mitorotonda Services, Inc., d/b/a Chief Fire Prevention et al
as 1:2015cv05778
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero and Juan Muniz
Defendant:
Frank Mitorotonda , Chief Fire Prevention & Mechanical Corp. and Mitarotonda Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Romero v. J&F Analysts Inc et al
as 4:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Jose Romero and Ximena Romero
Defendant:
J&F Analysts Inc , John J. Irwin, Sr., Debra Lee Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
