Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sledge v. Anchorage Police Department, et al.
as 26-2483
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER SLEDGE
Defendant:
ANCHORAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF ALASKA
United States of America v. Sledge
as 26-2448
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER SLEDGE
Sledge v. Harkless, et al.
as 26-2466
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER SLEDGE
Defendant:
ROBERT HARKLESS, Federal Bureau Investigation Agent, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, Former President of United States and UNKNOWN PARTY, Superintendent Director of Institution CO II
Sledge v. Harkless, et al.
as 26-2477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER SLEDGE
Defendant:
ROBERT HARKLESS, FBI Federal Agent, THOMAS, Superintendent Correctional Officer, BUTTONS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dansby v. Ross et al
as 4:2026cv04022
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Defendant:
Heath Ross, Charles Friday, Prosecutor Ben Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. Sorenson et al
as 4:2026cv04021
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Sorenson, Corporal Hunter Halliday, Sergeant Dusty Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00753
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01310
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
