Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ringland v. Rossiter et al
as 8:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Chief Justice Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. and Senior Justice Joseph F. Bataillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ringland v. Senior U.S. Dist. Judge Joseph F. Bataillon
as 8:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Senior U.S. Dist. Judge Joseph F. Bataillo and Senior U.S. Dist. Judge Joseph F. Bataillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Rossiter et al
as 3:2022cv01194
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Thomas Fabrice, Max Jean Baptiste and others
Defendant:
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Francisco Pares-Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01432
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Matthew R. Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv00868
Petitioner:
Randall David Due
Respondent:
USA, Matthew R. Hoffman, Brian D, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 3:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Bataillon, Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Due and Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
