Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MAPLE v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAPLE
Defendant:
LARRY KRASNER, LAWRENCE J GOODE, COLE STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. EVERS et al
as 2:2021cv02505
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. EVERS, JACQUELINE F. ALLEN and IDEE E. FOX
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA II v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv02657
Defendant:
JAMES-C DUFF, GERALD-AUSTIN [MCHUGH], DONALD-JOHN TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
HAMLET GARCIA II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00556
Defendant:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CHRISTINE COULTER, JACQUELINE F. ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
BAHIYA MORTON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. HEINZ et al
as 2:2015cv01236
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. MURPHY
Defendant:
JESSICA M. HEINZ, ERNEST F. KOSCHINEG, JOSEPH H. EVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HALL v. MCGETTIGAN et al
as 2:2012cv01433
Plaintiff:
VAN HALL
Defendant:
JOE MCGETTIGAN , DIANE CURRY , JOSEPH H. EVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOOBEEN et al v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2009cv05257
Plaintiff:
ALI JOOBEEN and JIAN JOOBEEN
Defendant:
RICARDO C. JACKSON, MARTHA LETO-MORRIS, STEPHEN DICKERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
