Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs Incorporated et al v. Pima, County of
as 4:2021cv00512
Plaintiff:
Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs Incorporated, Dawn Barkman and Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Joseph Murphy v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections , Jill Robinson , Michael Schramm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Joseph Murphy, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 14-55945
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TEVON TAYLOR, an individual, JESSE SUCHON, an individual, CRAIG TERRY, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MURPHY
Defendant - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AKA Wachovia Mortgage FSB
Joseph Murphy, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 14-55887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH MURPHY, an individual, RONALD JEFFERSON, an individual, CINDY MYERS JOSEPH, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AKA Wachovia Mortgage FSB
Joseph Murphy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2014cv01444
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jefferson, Cindy Myers Joseph, Joseph Murphy and others
Murphy et al v. Kay et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Murphy and Kimberly Ann Murphy
Defendant:
Bradley Kay and Bradley Kay, CPA, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Bradley Kay, CPA, Inc. and Bradley Kay
Counter_defendant:
Kimberly Ann Murphy and Timothy Joseph Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation v. Alioto et al
as 3:2006cv05109
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Brandon Alioto, Daniel S. Baldwin, David Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
