Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NICHOLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02385
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03072
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO AVILA, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NICHOLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00775
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv01115
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ndioba Niang, et al v. Emily Carroll, et al
as 16-3968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ndioba Niang and Tameka Stigers
Defendant - Appellee:
Emily Carroll, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners, Wayne Kindle, In his official capacity as a member of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners, Jackie Crow, In her official capacity as a member of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners and others
Defendant:
Betty Leake
Niang et al v. Carroll et al
as 4:2014cv01100
Plaintiff:
Ndioba Niang and Tameka Stigers
Defendant:
Emily Carroll , Wayne Kindle , Betty Leake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cintas Corporation v. Anderson et al
as 3:2006cv05079
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Darren Mitchell Anderson , Jason Scott Bigelow , Jonathan Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
