Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Joseph Ramirez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ramirez
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Edward Delgado, James Krachmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. Sierzega et al
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Larice Nelson, Shyheim Hurde, Sammie Gage and others
Defendant:
William T. Sierzega, Quontez L. Harrington, Scott J. Pietryla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Ramirez v. Patrick Covello
as 5:2022cv00614
Petitioner:
Joseph Ramirez and Joseph W. Ramirez
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Ramirez v. People of The State of California
as 5:2021cv01851
Petitioner:
Joseph Ramirez
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41806
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18725
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ramirez v. San Estefan et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Petitioner:
James Joseph Ramirez
Respondent:
Hector Balderas and FNU San Estefan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oglesby v. Graney et al
as 1:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Saundra Oglesby
Defendant:
Kevin Graney and Joseph Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Alex Hernandez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73332
Petitioner:
ALEX HERNANDEZ, AKA Louie Gonzalez, AKA Louis Gonzalez, AKA Alex Jovanoe Hernandez, AKA Joseph Ramirez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
