Cases 1 - 10 of 39
NELSON v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY HARRY LAUREL, JORGE DOMINICIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Plummer v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM PLUMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. ROBERT MAXA and others
Pew v. HUNER et al
as 2:2022cv05037
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
BRITNEY HUNER, MANDY SIPPLE, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Delflorio
as 3:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Joseph Silva
Defendant:
Delflorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Robleoo et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joseph Silva
Defendant:
Robleoo, Burns, Kristen Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv00284
Defendant:
Pamela Jusur, Lisa Besette, McCreary and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZEHRING v. SORBER et al
as 2:2020cv03195
Defendant:
DR. STEPHEN WIENER, TAMMY FERGUSON, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. ZEHRING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
