Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHAMPION v. SENDWELL, INC.
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION
Defendant:
SENDWELL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CHAMPION et al v. DOES
as 1:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION and CHRISTINA JONES
Defendant:
DOES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Champion et al v. Boehm et al
as 2:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion, Asif Lundstrom, Todd Horne and others
Defendant:
Michael Boehm and Hosting Response, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joshua Champion v. Does
as 2:2022cv05840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion, Nick Miller, Rosie Clarke and others
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Michael Boehm and Hosting Response, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Champion et al v. Sethi et al
as 2:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion and Trent Alvord
Defendant:
Hameet Sethi, Jon Reyes, DeShawn Tavilla and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Champion v. Francisco
as 6:2022cv06332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Champion
Defendant:
Justin Francisco
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CHAMPION v. DOES 1-10
as 1:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION
Defendant:
DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CHAMPION v. THE CREDIT PROS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv10814
Defendant:
KAPLAN JASON and THE CREDIT PROS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Brown v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2021cv01397
Defendant:
Daniel McNicholas, Armando Chagoya, Joshua Champion and others
Plaintiff:
Amir Brown and Maurice Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Chagoya, et al v. City of Chicago
as 19-3180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE COLEMAN, NICHOLAS CHRABOT, ARMANDO CHAGOYA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
