Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Westley v. Brandeshawn Harris, et al
as 23-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WESTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, WARDEN LASHANN EPPINGER, MICHAEL BEEBE and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
MILLER v. ARMALE et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL JOSHUA MILLER
Respondent:
ARMALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. ARMEL et al
as 1:2021cv00269
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL JOSHUA MILLER
Respondent:
ARMEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. ZAKEN
as 1:2020cv00268
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL JOSHUA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dashaun Wright v. Gonzalas Arias, et al
as 17-17374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DASHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
GONZALAS ARIAS, JAYSON ARTINGER, DOMINIC STURGEON-BEZOLTE and others
Moody et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jesse Edward Moody, Jamaal Rackley and Joshua Miller
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Mike Bruno, T. S. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Arias et al
as 3:2016cv00437
Defendant:
Gonzalas Arias, Jayson Artinger, Boone-Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Dashaun Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv01586
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MILLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Campana v. Baker et al
as 3:2016cv00303
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Harold Byrne, Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Campana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campana v. Baker et al
as 3:2016cv00218
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Connie Bisbee, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Campana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
