Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Jordan v. Foldessey et al
as 3:2018cv02083
Defendant:
Ashley Shaffer, Patricia Foldessey, South Carolina House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eldilemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04186
Defendant:
Chase Manhattan Banking Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Faieda Eldilemi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Eldilemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2018cv04180
Defendant:
Chase Manhattan Banking Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Faieda Eldilemi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Eldilemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04188
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Manhattan Banking Corporation
Plaintiff:
Faieda Eldilemi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Reece v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 2:2018cv01303
Plaintiff:
Eulita Ann Reece
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyce v. The Bank of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02598
Defendant:
Bank of Manhattan Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank and The Bank of New York
Plaintiff:
Craig Boyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dangelmaier v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.,
as 6:2018cv06125
Plaintiff:
Helle Dangelmaier
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallinger v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2017cv00804
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank doing business as Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Douglas K. Gallinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiley v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 4:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Bernard Wiley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sims v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.
as 1:1978cv01282
Plaintiff:
Michael Sims
Defendant:
American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.
Interested_party:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
