Cases 1 - 10 of 202
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant:
John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2023cv15609
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Barker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Houston v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Larry Houston
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Frank Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brown v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2020cv04893
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jean Brown
Defendant:
Erika Williams, James D. Montgomery & Associates, Ltd., JP Morgan Chase Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Van Dyke v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 1:2022cv06063
Plaintiff:
Christel Van Dyke
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. d/b/a Chase Bank, a national banking association, Chase Home Finance L.L.C., Cyprexx Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
