Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Nowak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv05898
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Martin Nowak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Houston v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Larry Houston
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Frank Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Brown v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02775
Plaintiff:
D'Amonte Brown
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and James Dimon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Dames v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv06962
Plaintiff:
Marquis Dames
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Noemi Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leto v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2022cv04847
Plaintiff:
Filippo Leto
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JOHN DOE and R and D Employees John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Smith v. JP Morgan Bank, NA et al
as 2:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Smith
Defendant:
JP Morgan Bank, NA, JP Morgan Chase & Co. doing business as Chase Bank and Unnamed Chase Bank Associates 1, 2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv10193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
