Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PETITT v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA et al
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Anita Petitt
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND and CBRE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MOLLER ENTERPRISES LLC v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01931
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
MOLLER ENTERPRISES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lintner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 4:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Marjorie F Lintner
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
