Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PS) Halajian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2023cv01522
Plaintiff:
Barry Stuart Halajian
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Elizabeth Ostrowski, Hasset & George, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robinson, Jr v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Lowell Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Leandro Guillen, Joya Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosemarie Mesa et al v. Victor Luis Mesa et al
as 2:2021cv03550
Defendant:
Community Realty & Investments, Steven Busey dba Home Systems Data, OCWEN USVI SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Mesa
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-55237
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada
Soheyla Zoveidat v. Quality Loan Service Corporation
as 2:2019cv10152
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, EMC Mortgage Corporation, First American Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Soheyla Zoveidat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamayo v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv00076
Defendant:
Clark County, County of Clark, JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Plaintiff:
Teresita F. Tamayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Trespass on Public Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
