Cases 61 - 70 of 92
Brown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 4:2014cv00361
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Mark McDonald
Plaintiff:
Shaquana Annette Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Shupe, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 14-15584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHUPE and MARIA L. SHUPE
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA, Erroneously named as JPMorgan Chase Bank of Arizona
Rice v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 7:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Rice
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pennington v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 2:2014cv00251
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Pennington, Jr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shawna Bates v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 13-15340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWNA BATES, a.k.a. Shawna Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Daley v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2013cv03387
Plaintiff:
Laurel M. Daley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deelen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 4:2013cv01931
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Deelen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Keith Stansell, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 13-12642
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEITH STANSELL, MARC GONSALVES, THOMAS HOWES and others
Movant - Appellant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
KAAT v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01778
Plaintiff:
LINDA KAAT
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Kolta v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2013cv01584
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Kolta
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Investment Services, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
