Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Morel v. Taveras
as 0:2024cv60724
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Morel
Defendant:
Franklin A. Taveras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States v. Juan Alvarez-Sorto
as 24-1888
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Francisco Alvarez-Sorto, Spanish, also known as Juan Francisco Alvarez, also known as Juanito R., also known as Juan Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lara Recinos et al v. Weinfeld et al
as 1:2023cv07517
Defendant:
Benzion Eli Weinfeld, Benjamin, Giovanni Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Lara Recinos, Eva Fabiola Galeano and Nelson Bilander Del Cid Orellano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
United States of America v. Cuartas Villegas
as 23-6152
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO CUARTAS VILLEGAS and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PABLO EFRAIN CAMERO BERNAL, JOSE MARIA CASTILLO BERRIO and JESUS ALBERTO MORELO CASTILLO
Luqueno-Garcia v. Garland
as 23-2024
Petitioner:
JUAN FRANCISCO LUQUENO-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Montejo Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 21-304
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO GONZALEZ, DANY JUAN FRANCISCO MONTEJO and MARIA NATALIA FRANCISCO MONTEJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
MENDIETA v. HOLIDAY CVS, LLC
as 1:2023cv23439
Plaintiff:
JUAN FRANCISCO MENDIETA
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
