Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Withers v. Judge Cruze
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge Cruze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Renzi et al
as 1:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dyanna M. White
Defendant:
Judge Eugene Renzi, Judge Peter Shwerzmann, Attorney Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Behroozi v. Chief Judge Jeremiah et al
as 1:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Justice Debra E. Disegna, Judicial Officer John E. McCann III, Chief Judge Jeremiah and others
Plaintiff:
Artecia Behroozi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. McBurney et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Silva
Defendant:
Richard Raspallo, U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha, Magistrate John F. McBurney, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas Jr. v. DiMuro
as 1:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Judge George W. DiMuro
Plaintiff:
William A Lucas Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bispo v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families et al
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, Judge Haiganush Bedrosian, Hasbro Childrens Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Vera Lucia Alves Bispo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Petitioner:
Charles Randall
Respondent:
A. T. Wall, Peter Kilmartin, Magistrate Judge Harwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcello et al v. Constable Alfred Harris et al
as 1:2007cv00055
Plaintiff:
James C. Marcello and Olivia A. Marcello
Defendant:
Constable Alfred Harris, John Lacross, Judge Patricia Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
