Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Mathis v. Ziegler et al
as 5:2018cv01111
Defendant:
D. L. Young, Joel Ziegler, Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-066.000-ROW-T et al
as 5:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-066.000-ROW-T, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Connie Lou Augustine, Audry L. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
MARTIN v. JEFFRIES et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
George Keith Martin
Defendant:
Sherri Jeffries, W.V. Child Protection Services, Richard Sherrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judge v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01331
Plaintiff:
Beverly Judge
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Warren v. Crook et al
as 5:2015cv00088
Petitioner:
Paul W. Warren
Respondent:
Steven M. Crook, Marion County Circuit Court, Judge Janes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Judge v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08516
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Judge
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadnax v. Pugh, et al
as 5:2015cv03736
Defendant:
Emmitt Pugh, Tim Deems, Jefferey S. Shumate and others
Plaintiff:
Ethelbert Clarence Defoli Broadnax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coonts v. Randolph County Circuit Court Judge et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
William Wayne Coonts
Defendant:
Randolph County Circuit Court Judge, Randolph County Commission, Department of Health and Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Foster v. Charnock et al
as 2:2014cv24232
Plaintiff:
Carl C. Foster
Defendant:
Ann Charnock, Judge Kaufman, Judge Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
