Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Rogers v. Friend of the Court et al
as 5:2019cv12954
Defendant:
Attorney Grievance Commission, Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, Friend of the Court and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Visner v. Janes et al
as 2:2019cv11487
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Visner
Defendant:
Eric Janes and Judicial Tenure Commission
Arnold et al v. State of Michigan 46th Judicial District et al
as 2:2019cv10653
Defendant:
Renee Shelide, State of Michigan 46th Judicial District, Southfield Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Arnold Private Religious Trust and Ernestine Arnold
State of Michigan Sixth Judicial Circuit Court et al v. El Davis
as 2:2018cv12936
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of, Quicken Loans, Inc., Trott Law, P.C. and others
Defendant:
Noble Marcus El Davis
Caselberry v. Yarbrough et al
as 2:2018cv12940
Defendant:
Anthony Yarbrough, Deidra Gilbert, 3rd Judicial Circuit Friend of the Court and others
Plaintiff:
Devaughn Caselberry
Lanzon v. Unadilla Township Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv12819
Defendant:
Raymond Prater, William J. Vailliencourt, Jr., Shawn M. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl-Christopher Lanzon
Bryant v. Monroe County Friend of the Court et al
as 2:2018cv12735
Defendant:
Kirk McMullen, Don Duncan, Doug Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Bryant
Lanzon v. Livingston, County of et al
as 2:2018cv12737
Defendant:
William J. Vailliencourt, Jr., Shawn M. Ryan, Carol Sue Reader and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl-Christopher Lanzon
Lanzon v. State of Michigan, County of Livingston et al
as 2:2018cv12641
Defendant:
State of Michigan, County of Livingston, State of Michigan 44th Judicial Court, Honorable Michael P. Hatty and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl-Christopher Lanzon
Thompson v. Sixth Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2018cv11790
Petitioner:
Edward Thompson
Respondent:
Sixth Judicial Circuit and Friend of the Court of Oakland County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
