Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Pratt v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff: Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant: District Judge Jack Barker, Chief Deputy Charlie Phillips and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02032
Plaintiff: Aiden Jones
Defendant: Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03016
Plaintiff: Karen Thomas and Jack Thomas
Defendant: Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Patton et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff: Aiden Jones
Defendant: Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv03032
Plaintiff: Aiden Jones
Defendant: Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odem v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Jack Odem, III
Defendant: John Felts, Andy Shock, Lona McCastlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2023cv05177
Plaintiff: Angela G. Davis
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Shaw v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00187
Plaintiff: Jack A Shaw
Defendant: Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hicks v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02073
Plaintiff: Jack Burt Hicks
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maskell v. Puryear We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff: Adam Maskell
Defendant: Judge Jack Crews Puryear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?