Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Constant v. Thomas et al
as 2:2018cv13056
Plaintiff:
Joseph Constant
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Jack Lin, Douglass Pierce and others
Robles v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04379
Plaintiff:
Raul Robles
Defendant:
City of Chicago , David Salgado, Xavier Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shred Ready, Inc. v. Lin et al
as 3:2017cv02029
Defendant:
Inspire Elements Inc., Amy Lin, Jack Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Shred Ready, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Levi Strauss & Co. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv02572
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Guangzhou Doobo Textile Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Zengcheng Wide Source Clothing Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
AHMED et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
WAHEED AHMED , ASMA WAHEED , MUHAMMAD AYZAD WAHEED AWAN and others
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and JACK LIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SYED v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
MAHMOOD AKHTAR SYED
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and JACK LIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv13087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
