Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Logan v. Facebook et al
as 6:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. UTZ Quality Foods Inc et al
as 6:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jackie Logan and Jack Logan
Defendant:
UTZ Quality Foods Inc and Travelers Claim Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Estate of Eric Jack Logan v. City of South Bend, et al
as 21-2922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF ERIC JACK LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH BEND and RYAN O'NEILL, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as a Sergeant of the South Bend Police Department
Logan v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2019cv00495
Defendant:
City of South Bend, RYAN O'NEILL, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as a Sergeant of the South Bend Police Department, Ryan O'Neill and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of ERIC JACK LOGAN, deceased
Estate Plaintiff:
Eric Jack Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. United States Congress
as 6:2019cv02182
Defendant:
United States Congress
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. South Carolina, State of
as 3:2016cv03470
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Black Lives Matter Organization et al
as 6:2016cv02599
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter Organization, Patrisse Cullers, Opal Tometi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2016cv02348
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shuler v. Logan et al
as 1:2010cv01993
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lynn Shuler
Defendant:
Jack Logan and Land Span, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
