Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roberson v. Minatles et al
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant:
John Doe and Lt. Minatles
Plaintiff:
Jackie Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Merken
as 3:2018cv01764
Plaintiff:
Jackie Roberson
Defendant:
Lt. Merken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Cleland et al
as 3:2018cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jackie Roberson
Defendant:
D. Cleland, Carol McBride, C/O King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jackie Roberson
Defendant:
Supt. Jones, Officer Reodriguz, Marquis Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Ping et al
as 3:2016cv00831
Plaintiff:
Jackie Roberson
Defendant:
Nalter Ping and LPN Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERSON et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv80306
Plaintiff:
JACKIE ROBERSON, JACKIE ROBERSON, JOAN ROBERSON and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
AMES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86404
Plaintiff:
JACKIE ROBERSON AMES
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBERSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv80596
Plaintiff:
JACKIE ROBERSON
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROBERSON v. WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv79642
Plaintiff:
JACKIE ROBERSON
Defendant:
WESTINHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown et al vs. Bledsoe County, Tennessee et al.
as 1:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Edward Mack Brown, Edward Mack Brown, Charlie Young, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bledsoe County, TN, Timmie J. Campbell, Junior Lee Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
